I in no way condone racist attacks. But that includes attacks against whites. Why is it that attacks against "people of color" get hysterical, non-stop coverage while anti-white attacks are down-played or even supressed?
It is a statistical fact that native Europeans are FAR more likely to be attacked by people "of immigrant background" than the other way around.
For example, everyone makes a big deal about the "rumble" in Germany a few days back between blacks and whites. But why no mention anywhere of the knife attack by 4 Turks against a 20-year old German kid for no other reason than he had painted his face with German flag colors for the World Cup?
Or why do people keep repeating that the Potsdam attack was "clearly" a racist attack? We now evidence that the victim was drunk, had been picking fights all night, and apparently suffered his injuries from hitting the back of his head when falling on the curb (NOT by being kicked on the ground).
When these facts came out, people scoffed at them as if they didnīt matter. They DO matter!
Or the fact that the kids who stabbed Joe at the Terminal were Polish gypsies is covered up, while the backround of every racist white attacker is scrutinized. If being a "right winger" supposedly makes you prone to racist attacks, why does being a gypsy not make you prone to crime in general?
So by all means report racist attacks but:
1. Report ALL attacks
2. Report ALL the facts
The way the shooting in Antwerp is misused as yet another excuse to suppress the Vlaams Blok, a legitimate, peaceful democratic party is outrageous. Vlaams Blok is not the cause of racial tension -- the real cause is surging, uncontrolled immigration and globalization which changing European cultures almost overnight.
Itīs the politicians who have let this happen who should be put on trial!