X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)
Advertisement
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Lost posts
kathaksung
post Dec 6 2006, 05:53 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 43,738



Although there is figure in column of 'replies" and "views" in the thread "my America nightmare", the page says "No posts exist for this topic" when I clicked in. Does everybody see same thing as I did? Or the posts were deleted?

I continue that thread here.

447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)

I believe Bush administration has planned a dirty bomb attack on US and with which as justification he'll bomb Iran's nuclear plant.

1. 9/21. Quote, "Karl Rove Promises October Surprise
Ronald Kessler Thursday, Sept. 21, 2006

WASHINGTON -- In the past week, Karl Rove has been promising Republican insiders an "October surprise" to help win the November congressional elections.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...20/141615.shtml

2. 10/9. North Korea had a nuclear test.
10/9.(?) Debka reports that three US naval strike groups will be in the Persian Gulf opposite Iran.

3. 10/12. A warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".

4. 10/21. Three US naval task forces grouped on the sea opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf

Quote, "The American Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group joins US build-up opposite Iran

October 23, 2006 Debka

Tuesday, Oct. 17, the Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group steamed into the Persian Gulf to join the US naval, air and marine concentration piling up opposite Iran's shores.

The Iwo Jima group is now cruising 60 km from Kuwait off Iran's coast. As DEBKAfile and DEBKA-Net-Weekly reported exclusively two weeks ago, three US naval task forces will be in place opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea by October 21. The other two are the USS Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group and the USS Enterprise Strike Group.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...;articleId=3575

5. 10/26. TV news reported that China arrested two North Koreans whom tried to sell ** gram of Uranium.

6. 11/4. Taiwan's pro-independence president Chen is accused of embezzlement and faces a pressure of resignation.

Quote, "Taiwan's president implicated
His wife, aides are charged in corruption case

Public prosecutors indicted Chen's wife and two former aides Friday on charges of embezzling money from a secret diplomatic fund under Chen's control. Chen himself cannot be indicted while in office." (By Joseph Kahn New Your Times 11/4/06)

N.Korea's nuclear test and the arrest of two N. Koreans who tried to sell small amount of Uranium, plus planned dirty bomb attack in US would give Bush an excuse to attack Iran's nuclear site. It was done in collaboration with China. In early November, China got its payment. One of its most hated - the president of Taiwan: Chen Shui-Bian - was in big trouble. He faces an impeachment in legislature.

One thing ridiculous is: The nuclear test was in North Korea. Kim threatened a war with the US. Should US have its naval strike force gathered at the Sea of Japan instead of the Persian Gulf? I put a missing ring here: A dirty bomb attack is planned to take place in US. That's something Bush expected to see in his crystal ball. That was why he moved US fleet into Mid-east in advance.

Rove failed his promise of an October surprise. I think due to my revelation. I myself is one target of their's. For more than a month, I tried to stay at home to avoid a bombing. To cover up a bombing in North San Jose, the plot planned massive attacks. (seven NFL football stadiums will be hit, according to the 10/12 warning) Although election is over, the possiblility of "terror attack" is still there. Because the target of Feds is still there.

448. Highway 680 pass-over bridge was a bomb target (11/15/06)

There is a small shopping center near my residence. There is an oriental super market there, plus some small stores. Since Feds moved a lot of Vietnamese informants in my area, the owner of these stores are almost all Vietnamese. Though it is the nearest food shop, I tried not to buy food there because I encountered most poisoned food there. I would rather walk 20 to 40 minutes to other markets where the food is less poisoned.

In later September, a food advertisement caught my eye. It was from a supermarket I often went. The food priced low were the food I used to buy. "Do they prepare the poisoned food for me?" I thought at first. Then, the Rove's "October surprise" news reminded me there might be a "terror bombing" planned. The supermarket located at the cross of Capital Ave. and Hostetter Rd. where Highway 680 passes through. I have to go underneath the pass-over of Highway 680 to that super market. However reluctant it is, it more or less can give Feds a justification that a Highway pass-over is a target of "Al Qaida". On 10/5, I wrote #440 to warn there might be a "dirty bomb" attack.

In October, I only went to the small shopping center near my house. In mid October, there was a RV parked along the road opposite to the entrance of that oriental food market. It distributed free booklet for Buddhism. It parked there for a week and so, never intervened by police or the land owner. I have experience that Feds used to use RV as temporary surveillance station. Then several times I saw big 40 feet container parked at the road side or in the parking lot. It was a small shopping center. A 40 feet container was very conspicuous. This was something I never saw before. Compare with the news:"The bombs, according to the posting, would be delivered to the stadiums in trucks." ("Dirty bomb' threat doubted" Mercury news, 10/19) Obviously the Feds tried to warn me, "this place is monitored, will be bombed". The purpose was to push me to the other market where a real bomb trap has been set up.

The intimidation pushed me to write "443. October surprise (2) (10/20/06)" and "445. Dirty bomb attack (10/30/06)"

After the election day, was the operation of October surprise over? At the night of 11/9, I went out to the street to have a look. Feds used to keep one or two cars patrolled the street around my house, 24 hours, I think. That night at 9:10, to my surprise, there were five. The surveillance intensified, because my revelation disturbed their Iran war plan? I went out several times that night to see how these agents operated. Each time, Feds called for 2 or three cars coming. Those agents, or support group, live nearby but have a fake cover up house in my community. Once called, they quickly came, pretending return home. At 9:30, there came an agent whose cover up house is opposite my lane. He drove his Ford truck, passed his house but not stopped, slowly passed me. I watched his car. At the cross road, he made a U-turn, came back and parked his car at the side where I stood. He came to me, asking a question, tried to start a talk with me. I told him I knew what kind of a man he was.

"What am I?" he asked. I really had no mood to talk to the man who monitored me for more than 10 years. So let him go on his solo. Agents used to turn a smiling face to their victims, but I know there is an evil will behind the mask. I was disgust to talk with him. He at last left for his "house".

What kind of man is he? He belongs to a "tire" team which having a tire company as cover up. Though the members later have different jobs as cover up. Their headquarter was at the next lane of mine. His cover up house is cross street, opposite my lane. The B-house Vietnamese in my lane worked with this team, once I observed.

Next day on 11/10, the man came into my lane, stood at my daughter's car, watched inside to write down some information. It was a provocation. I didn't say a word to him. He left when I took out a camera. Of course, he was ordered to do so.

Today, 11/15, a RV is parked opposite my lane. A psycho show off? Persecution intensified.

449. Harassing in internet (11/20/06)

My revelation of dirty bomb attack is very correct. Feds not only increased the patrolling car around my house, they also blocked me to access to many web sites in internet. In some sites, my thread was missing. When I tried to find it by "search", the page turned out was aimed at me. Here are some intimidation obviously from the surveillance team:

"Not Found
The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed is either outdated, inaccurate, or the server has been instructed not to let you have it."
http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/

" you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

The search feature has been turned off at this time for non-contributing members due to server load. If it becomes possible to turn this on in the future for all members then we will do so. "
http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/forums/sho...008&page=13

Yesterday(11/19), I posted " 447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)" in a thread in halflife.com forum. Ten minutes later, I went back to that thread and found the whole article was missing. Instead there was a sentence "You bore me" which was not written by me. The Feds doesn't want people know the truth. They even replaced my article with their own words and made it look like written by me.

Today I went there and found #447 was deleted once again. This time he left with his name.

The page: "You bore me." (sentence left by someone who deleted the message 447)

This is not my words. My original post was changed in minutes. By surveillance team, I think. (my comment when I refill #447)

COMRADE: Nope, edited by me - I find it amusing. (Comrade Badger made a second delete and admit the words was left by him. )
__________________
I heart the FBI

Last edited by ComradeBadger : Yesterday at 09:33 PM.


450. Next plot (11/20/06)

Feds always attack people in the name of "terrorist". The tactic they used to use are: 1. Local terror cell such like in the cases of "Miami terror cell", "New York tunnel bombing". 2. Al Qaida warning. In each plot we always heard the threat from Bin Laden, or his vice Zawahiri. Al Jazeera did the work to broadcast their tape. 3. Terror attack in Britain. It started from last year. We saw 7/7/05 London bombing; 7/21/05 London bombing; 2006 August liquid bomb event.

2006 October surprise plot was a new invention. The role was the nuclear test of North Korea. One interesting phenomenon was in that period the other three traditional evil factor: local terror cell; Al Qaida and Britain terror story were all in vacation. Not a word was heard about them in US mid-term election. Because this time the guy on duty was N. Korea.

On 11/7, election was over. The shift for N. Korea was over. Was the dirty bomb and Iran war plan over too? It seems not.

On 11/10, Israel said it might strike Iran. The mid-east war is for the security of Israel. When puppet Bush failed to carry out an "October surprise". His master may do it by himself.

Quote, "Israel official: Strike on Iran possible
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer
Fri Nov 10, 12:17 PM ET

The deputy defense minister suggested Friday that Israel might be forced to launch a military strike against Iran's disputed nuclear program — the clearest statement yet of such a possibility from a high-ranking official.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_...el_iran_nuclear

At same time, on 11/10, Al Qaida and British intelligence came back to the stage again.

Quote, "Al-Qaida plotting nuclear attack on UK, officials warn
Vikram Dodd, Tuesday November 14, 2006, The Guardian

The warning comes after a speech last week by the foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett, on the terrorist threat facing the UK, and a rare public outing for Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the head of MI5, who warned that there were at least 30 active plots to attack Britain."

To bomb Iran's nuclear site needs a big excuse. Nothing will do it except a dirty bomb attack (or even a nuclear attack) Beware of a "Christmas surprise". The bombing gift will come from your own government but packaged in the sheet of "terrorist".

451. The death of former Russian spy (11/25/06)

Ex-KGB spy Litvinenko died in London on 11/23. He said Kremlin poisoned him. Litvinenko is a traitor of Russia. Russia has motive to kill him. That's the foundation Litvinenko's accusation based on. But I think in different way. The reason:

1. Government rarely do such high profile murder case. Politically it hurts more than being benefited. An unilateral murder like this one would cause serious diplomatic problem between two countries.

2. Such murder used to be done in cross secret deal between the secret police of the two countries.

3. Litvinenko defected in 1990's. There is little intelligence value left for him for the Western. He is a sacrifice in secret deal. Litvinenko and another defector - Lt. Benlenko had a common lot. There is a strong similarity in their poison case. Re: "The thing impressed me most was the pilot was poisoned when he was hidden in witness shelter. Belenko was still young but he was bald. The medical examination concluded that it was caused by slow poison of a kind of rare metal. ....Most likely he became a Quinea pig for intelligence in test of slow poison. When he was of no use but a burden for them. See "186. Slow poison (12/6/03)"" Litvinenko was poisoned by rare metal. He is hairless too.

5. I think he is part of a secret deal. The deal is to justify a dirty bomb, (or even a nuclear bomb). There was such a deal in October. (N. Korea nuclear test and later China arrested two N. Koreans for selling small amount of Uranium.) The deal failed after my revelation. Russia now replaces the role of N.Korea. Russia will play the role of the source of the radioactive material (or even a nuclear bomb).

6. The payment to Russia is WTO and the life of one defector.

Re: "US deal lets Russia join WTO
By Andrew E. Kramer and Edmund L. Andrews
New York Times November 11, 2006

Moscow - Officials in Washington and Moscow reached an agreement in principle for Russia to join the WTO. "

7. The purpose of the deal is to justify a radioactive bombing on Western so Bush can start another Mid-east war - bombing Iran's nuclear site.

8. Litvinenko's case is used to cover up the planned "nuclear terror bombing ". It told public in advance: see, we have a conflict. The bombing plot was not a collaborate work planned by us.

9. If Litvinenko was poisoned on 11/1 as he alleged , then after weeks of medical treatment, he should have got better. Poison used to excreted after several days. What Litvinenko encountered with seems to be a continuing poisoning. His situation suddenly worsened and died on 11/23.

10. Why choosing 11/23? Because it will bring the cover up function into play to its best. I think Feds planned the "nuclear terror attack" day on 11/24. It is the "Black Friday" when the Christmas shopping season starts. An attack on shopping mall will cause large casualty which will give the full justification for Bush to bomb Iran.

The Inside Group had tasted the sweet by attacking people in 911. With which they started war in Afghan and Iraq.
They want to use same tactic to start war in Iran. "October surprise" aimed at the audience of seven NFL football stadiums. "November surprise" (I call it December surprise in #450) aimed at the Christmas shopping customers on Black Friday.
The principle originates from a government plan done 40 years ago:"Casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of indignation." (Quote from Northwoods Operation)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kathaksung
post May 9 2007, 03:30 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 43,738



Appology accepted. It's much better than a silent censorship. Don't know if it is.

I think the Feds doesn't want people know the real killer behind Virginia Tech shooting.

---------------

480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)

I think the Virginia Tech. massacre was done by Feds.

1. A very detailed news which disappeared later

On 4/16, I heard the tragedy from local Chinese TV news. It reported that the gunman's visa was issued in Shanghai, and his entry port was San Francisco. My first thought was: "How efficient they are. They got everything right away." Then I became suspicious. Shanghai? My family came from Shanghai. San Francisco? My parents, my sisters live in San Francisco, and have their business there. Next day was 4/17, the day I alleged for the breakout of a framed case. In message of March, I alleged the Feds had collaborated with Chinese secret police for a new drug case. The V.T. killer, obviously was a Chinese, according to the news. Was that part of new plot? When people didn't know what exactly happened inside Virginia Tech. was that strange we got such a detail news on 4/16? Nobody could have that detail except Feds. And nobody could release that to the media except Feds.

Here is the reference for that news. Watch the date the news was issuing. That news now is not available in Sun-Times URL. It was replaced by some different description.
Re: "Gunman kills 32 at Virginia Tech before being killed

April 16, 2007
BY MICHAEL SNEED Sun-Times Columnist

Sneed hears authorities were investigating whether the gunman who killed 32 people in a rampage on the Virginia Tech campus was a Chinese national who arrived in the United States last year on a student visa.

The 25-year-old man being investigated for the deadliest college carnage in U.S. history reportedly arrived in San Francisco on a United Airlines flight on Aug. 7, 2006, on a visa issued in Shanghai, the source said. Investigators had not linked him to any terrorist groups, the source added."

2. The purpose of Virginia Tech. massacre

The US intelligence used to influence American people by media with psychological operation. The news about WMD, the mushroom cloud threat, the film "300", numerous video tape of Bin Laden, Zhawahiri, Zhaqawi, the beheading tape of Nick Berg are all belong to this category. It is used to vilify Islamic and to inflame and agitate people. What if the plot was successful to their plan? People would have believed what Feds told them: the Chinese (Shanghainese) were evil people. They did drug smuggling; they massacre American students.

The most important role of V.T. killing was: it was planned to distract. I have revealed since last October to this March, in each month there was a plot. Each time I emphasized that they used Iran war as distract. Though I talked a lot about April 17 plot, this time I haven't talked about Iran war because I found none. Did Feds abandon their tactic? No, distract is an important tactic in Feds plan. When it became a familiar one to the people, Feds replaced it by a massacre. They killed students as many as possible to make it the worst in US history. This news withdraws public attention from other would be news such like drug case or unusual death in police brutality.

3. The Chinese killer replaced by Cho Seung Hui.

Mercury News on next day reported "Gonzales hearing postponed in wake of campus shooting". I have viewed this hearing as a mark of 4/17 plot in which Attorney General " ..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17." (see #477) Now it was postponed. It means the April plot was postponed. Then will China bear the accusation of "massacre American students"?

China is a big power. When it will to bear an unsavory reputation, the payment in secret deal must be huge. Now the plot went soured. Feds had to seek another replacement. That's why Cho Seung Hui became a killer. He is S. Korean. S. Korea, you know, a country controlled by US. (or protected by US, whatever you think) The image transfer is easy, at least it accords with the definition that "the killer is an Asian."
(To be continued.)

481. Feds ordered stand down (2) (4/28/07)

4. A strange "stand down" after the first shooting occurred at 7:15. The police and University did nothing to pursue the killer and warn students that there was killer(s) at large. According to authority's story, Cho was the only one did all killings. He was given a two hours and a half to do his work without a disturbance. That was indeed a very generous gift from authority and an unbelievable negligence on security rule, particularly at the time after 911.

(1) Another strange news which disappeared later. The original news said the reason of no-reaction was that information showed that killer was out of state. But it took time for killer to escape out of state, even if he took a plane. And how could they learn that? Did they knew whom he was and tracked him all the time? Since the no-reaction was from the beginning, this was a justification with big flaw. It was never heard of since. Local officials didn't know the business out of state. This news, as well as that detail of Chinese suspect, obviously was from Feds too.

(2) If you were Cho Seung Hui, once you fired the first shoot, you knew you were on a road of no-return, would you do something else? In common sense, a killer would go on with his shooting spree because he knew there was little time left for him. The police would arrive in minutes. Would you still care for mailing something? But Cho seemed think in other way. He thought of he hadn't mailed the tapes, (Authority story was that tapes was not made on 4/16) It took him one hour and three quarters to bring the tapes to post office, (7:15 - 9:01) enough time for him to have a breakfast and do a laundry if he wished. Cho didn't worry about police arrest. He was right. Police and University did response with no re-action.

(3) “Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,” Though it is a criminal negligence of no-response to the first two murders in University dorm, we saw little pressure to investigate and affix the responsibility of this massacre. Because it will trace to the Feds. ( Now they may try to find a scapegoat for it) They gave the order of "stand down". They need a history worst to distract another framed case.

Quote, "Feds Ordered VA Police To Stand Down
Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, April 20, 2007

Police and EMT workers at Virginia Tech tell us that campus police were given a federal order to stand down and not pursue killer Cho Seung-Hui as Monday's bloodshed unfolded.

Though wishing to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, we have received calls from police and EMT's who tell us that a stand down order was in place, and this is also confirmed by eyewitness Matt Kazee, who is a student at VA Tech.

Kazee talked to local EMT's and police who told him the same thing, that the order was to wait until federal back up arrived before any action was taken. This explains the complete non-response of the police in the two hour gap between Cho's first two murders and the wider rampage that would follow later that morning.

The policy of federal control over the University was put in place following a previous shooting in August 2006 in which a police officer and a hospital security guard were killed.

In addition, a former long-term University police officer, George French, told the Alex Jones Show that it is routine to seal off a campus on which a suspected gunman is loose.

“Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,” said French.

“After a double homicide, when you’re looking for a dangerous fellow with a firearm, I find it unfathomable that a series of roadblocks weren’t set up…to prevent the felon from escaping.”

French could find no logical conclusion other than deliberate inaction on the part of officials. “We have another coordinated, allowed event…the parallels are so common in each case; you can write the script in advance.”

<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=71573&sid=46a585298128996c43550b3544fce1a3>

(To be continued)

482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07)

Recently, I was harassed heavily in internet again. I was blocked to post in my own homepage as well as other web sites such like Google. I think it is a response to my revelation on Virginia Tech shootings. Feds don't want people to read it.

The persecution is so intensified that they created a highway collapse four days ago. I have talked about several times that one of their option to eliminate one of my sisters who lives in Oakland is to force her taking Bart while the Feds had planned a "terror bombing" in tunnel. The way to force my sister to take Bart instead of driving is to shut off the Bay Bridge. (see #433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)) When this trick was revealed, Feds developed another one: to shut off one of the exit way of the Bay Bridge. The collapsed highway 580 is a road of "must" if she drives from San Francisco to her home in Oakland. The shut off of Bay Bridge is too evident. It causes alert. This time one of the exit will be closed at least for half years. It saves them a sub-plan during that period.

Another motive of this created event is to cover up the 911 plot. To prove a fire could melt steel. It is a case of killing two birds by one stone. But it's not the motive only that makes me conclude it was a planned crime.

1. Timing: The newspaper said, "In the early morning hours, the freeways were nearly deserted." (Mercury News, April 30)

What is that "early morning hours"? 3:52 am. It was night that most people were in deep sleep. I can assure you, no outsider had the opportunity to witness the event. (Of course, exclude those prepared witness. Feds used to have "reliable witness" to prove their framed case. Such as Moussaoui to 911) At 3:52 am in week-days, there still may be chance that some one happened to drive by. Feds made it on Sunday. 3:52 am on Sunday, a most deserted time for freeway. A safest time to create an artificial accident.

2. The damaged overpass was just above highway 880. The tanker happened to burn right underneath at that point. The fire would have burned in open air if the oil tanker crashed a little bit farther or a little bit lesser. Was it a lottery winner that crash took place at the spot?

3. Location. A place with busy traffic: the exit of the Bay Bridge, where highway 880 and 580 going through. The best place for propaganda because hundreds of thousands of people drive by there every day.
A right accident (to reason the WTC collapse) at a right place (just at the cross point where a fire can burn the upper overpass. A place about half million commuters pass by every day, a best place for propaganda, ) at the right time. (the most deserted time of highway, so rare people could witness it)

So Bush and his accessories can beat the drum this time. It could be an accident. How rare the chance is, there is still lucky man who win the lottery or unlucky man who was hit by a thunder.

It also could be a black box operation to justify 911 attack. If you believe 911 was an inside job. Then this group has the motive to cover it up. If you think it was not a coincidence that the WTC was changed hands three months before 911 attack( to enable that group to set up explosives inside the building), then you have full reason to recognize it was not a coincidence too on timing and location for this event. It is another covert job to cover up the 911 event.

483. The video tape of Cho Seung Hui (3) (5/8/07)

5. The man in video tape is not Cho Seung Hui.

(1) Cho's family and his roommates don't recognize the man in video tape.

Re: "A pastor at a Korean church in Centreville watched the tapes on television with his family. He told the Seoul newspaper JoongAng Ilbo, " All my family said that was not the Seung-Hui we knew. It was the first time we saw him speaking in full sentences." ("Shooter/ A lifetime of silence" Mercury News, 4/22/07)

Re: "April 18, MSNBC, Scarborough Country -- Michele Kosinski reports at about 10:13 PM eastern time that Cho's roommates say they do not recognize him in the film from the package sent to NBC."
http://www.rense.com/general76/cho.htm

Go to that site to compare the pictures. Though they are similar, the ratio of the head is a big difference. (the ratio of the length to width of the head) Different camera won't produce such big difference.

(2) The man in video has a different temperament from Cho Seung Hui.

We all know Cho was "extraordinary lonely", "a life time of silence". He is also very shy and avoid to be in focus. Re: "When a candidate for student council visited the suite this year to pass out candy and ask for votes, Cho refused even to make eye contact.". "Mary Shaw said yearbooks indicate that Cho's only extracurricular activity was the science club during his sophomore year. He did not supply a picture of himself for his senior yearbook.". ("Shooter/ Classmates feared he would kill", Mercury News, 4/18/07)

But in video, the man liked to show off himself. He made different posts with guns, even with a hammer. He spoke fluent sentences. He stares at the focus. In his package, there is not only an 1,800 words statement, (For a real Cho, that's enough) there are also video tape and 43 photographs. Is that too much for him?

(3) These characters don't fit for Cho, but fit for Feds. The video tape resembles other "terrorist" tapes used to broadcast in TV. Those tapes used to do a negative propaganda on "terrorists" themselves. Painted themselves extreme, violent, savage by arms in hand, shooting machine guns, or even beheading. Those tapes used to fit the demand of Pentagon and the Feds - "Don't look for other suspects. I, (terrorist, or criminal) did it." Is there anything else more convenient to solve a case by someone to confess?

(4) An interesting message for reference.

Quote, "VIDEO PROOF THAT NBC FOOTAGE WAS NOT SHOT BY CHO ALONE

Posted By: Never_Surrender <Send E-Mail <http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?bem=103149>>
Date: Thursday, 19 April 2007, 10:01 p.m.

......

Well let me ask a question then, if he shot it by himself, WHY is the camera shaking, like someone ELSE is holding it?

The CHO character is sitting perfectly still in FRONT of the camera and not touching the camera YET it is moving!

At one point in this video I could swear I hear someone cough or clear their throat off camera and at another point I think someone hits the camera and you can hear the BUMP sound or the THUD sound that it makes and it shakes a little....

I believe that what we have here is video proof that CHO did NOT make this video, there was someone else holding the camera, again, I do NOT even believe it is Cho in this video but I have covered that in another post.

Here is the video....

Embedded video does not appear to be showing up so here is link to video....

<http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/view_video.php?viewkey=3efbc24c7d2583be6925 NS>
:<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAndAlibis_The_Forum/message/18347>


(To be continued)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DiZZy
post May 10 2007, 09:06 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,226
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 42,097



Jim, are you a complete knob or what ?

You actually talked to this tool ? and let him continue spamming ?

oh my....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ventho
post May 11 2007, 06:57 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 42,167



oh

dear
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mikeyt
post May 11 2007, 07:53 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Expatica Moderators
Posts: 699
Joined: 24-January 05
Member No.: 19,661



Kathaksung's in his own little world DiZ......and that might be a good thing for the rest of us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
post May 11 2007, 07:56 PM
Post #6





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0



(kathaksung)
Appology accepted. It's much better than a silent censorship. Don't know if it is.

I think the Feds doesn't want people know the real killer behind Virginia Tech shooting.

Not PARANOID, are we?

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kathaksung
post May 19 2007, 03:20 AM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 43,738



484. Gunman is a professional killer(4) (5/13/07)

6. The gunman is not Cho Seung Hui.

(1) The gunman is a professional killer. Cho is a new comer. Cho bought the gun on March 13. (There were different saying about the other gun, but it was bought around that time too. ) Only one month before the shooting case. He practiced in a shooting range on Mar. 22. That's all his relationship to the gun.

But according to Professor of Criminology:
Quote, "Seung-Hui Cho Was a Mind Controlled Assassin

Charles Mesloh, Professor of Criminology at Florida Gulf Coast University, told NBC 2 News that he was shocked Cho could have killed 32 people with two handguns absent expert training. Mesloh immediately assumed that Cho must have used a shotgun or an assault rifle.

"I'm dumbfounded by the number of people he managed to kill with these weapons," said Mesloh, "The only thing I can figure is that he got close to them and he simply executed them."

Mesloh said the killer performed like a trained professional, "He had a 60% fatality rate with handguns - that's unheard of given 9 millimeters don't kill people instantly," said Mesloh, stating that the handguns Cho used were designed for "plinking at cans," not executing human beings."

(http://infowars.com/articles/us/va_tech_shooter_was_mind_controlled_assassin.htm)

From media report, we know the weapon is not assault rifle. It is the 9 millimeter handgun and the killer shot at distance, (shooting at the door, not the execute style) So the gunman is a professional of the professionals.

(2) Cho was 5'8". Gunman is ""He was, I would say, about a little bit under six feet tall, young looking, Asian, dressed sort of strangely, almost like a Boy Scout, very short-sleeved light, tan shirt and some sort of ammo vest with black over it. He just stepped within five feet of the door and started firing.

"He seemed very thorough about it, getting almost everyone down. I was trying to act dead," the freshman mechanical engineering student says. "He left for about 30 seconds, came back in, did almost exactly the same thing. I guess he heard us still talking.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto.../specialComment

(3) The gunman didn't want to be recognized.

If Cho planned this tragedy, he knew it was a way of no return. He was ready to die himself. It was unnecessary to cover up himself with masks or sunglass..... But the gunman did all the cover up. He seemed know he would be alive and didn't want to be recognized later.

Quote, " Pai Cheong Ming - 27 years old, an engineering student, came from S. Korea - was wounded in breast and arm and was in hospital. He told "Central Daily" (S. Korean Newspaper): "The gunman wore a mask covering face, his brown cap wore low to his eyes. He wore glass," (Though the news didn't say it's a sunglass, I think it should be, because Cho Seung Hui wore contact lens that morning according to his roommate. Or there was another killer.)

Pai Cheong Ming's description was quite different from others. I never saw it from "mainstream media". Perhaps because it would contradict to the Authority's story. I read it from a Chinese newspaper "The Epoch Times" April 20.

(4) If Cho real hated the "rich kids, debauchery and deceitful charlatans", then there must be some model he knew. He shoud target on these models. In fact, he chose unknown as victims.

All witnesses referred the killer as "gunman" or "he". No one call the killer "Cho". It means they don't know Cho. Only media describe the killer as Cho. Did they witness the scene?

(5) Another mark of Feds: Silence the witness.

For a random killer, Cho should pick up easy one to shoot at. He should go on to other classroom where there were plenty of easy targets. But he came back to kill the survivor. "He seemed very thorough about it", "I was trying to act dead" he came back "I guess he heard us still talking" (see reference in (2)) Cho has no reason to be thorough on people he didn't know.
It is only a mark of Mafia or the Feds. They kill witness of their crime. Mafia has no motive in this case. Feds does. (see "480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)")

(to be continued)

485. Media censorship on VT case (5) (5/18/07)

7. The issue media accepted and rejected.

(1) For a crime, media used to have a field report. It used to come with a map. Investigate reporter would track every step of the killer to detail the story in minute. VT shooting is the worst camp case in US history. There is no such report. What happened in the dorm when first two people were killed? how many classrooms in Norris Hall building? What did other students in same building react during shooting? There is not a word about that. Different media reported odds and bits from survivors but all silenced later about this case.

(2) The no response of the police and University after the first two killings was the main reason that caused the later mass killing. Media has the responsibility to supervise the government. The criminal negligence should be the big issue in first page. Yet, no media had an article about it. They distract this big topic by gun ban. Let the big criminal skip away.

(3) Instead of reporting the detail of the whole story which might reveal the flaws of the framed case, media concentrated to report Cho's private life, tried to prove he is the real killer. I went through all these materials, find nothing could prove Cho was a violent man. True, he was lonely, life time silent. It fits for a word: autism. But media avoid this word, attribute all these for the killing spree. To prove Cho was anger, they said he wrote violent and profane plays. They even gave a sample of his play. "I hate him." the boy says of the stepfather in a copy of the play on the Web site. "Must kill Dick. Must kill Dick. Dick must die."

It's ridiculous. With such standard to judge a person, Shakespeare would be a big suspect. So were many ancient Greek tragedy writers. Hitch Cock (spelling?) - a terror film producer, would be a suspect too, so was Spieldsburg (spelling? who produces film Indiana Jones, the Temple of Doom).

Cho's only relationship to violence was that he bought a gun (or two) on March 13 and practiced one hour in a shooting ranch of March 22. I think he was going for an operation. Before I talked about this, I'd like you to read a news:

Re: "Cho went to bed early by college standards, about 9p.m. He often rose early, but in recent weeks he had been rising even earlier, frequently before dawn, Aust said. Such was the case Monday.

Cho awoke before 5 a.m., then sat down to work on his computer and awakened his roommate in the process. Grewal, who shares a room in the same suite, saw Cho in the bathroom shortly after 5 a.m.

As usual, Cho did not say anything to Grewal. No good morning, no hello, Grewal said. Cho stood in the bathroom, brushing his teeth, wetting his contact lenses and applying a moisturizer.

He also took a prescription medicine, though neither Aust nor Grewal knew what the medication was for." (Mercury News "Shooter/ classmates feared he would kill", 4/18/07)

To get up early before dawn is not popular, especially for those who do not habituate to. Did Cho's suitemate follow up Cho's routine? The description was so detailed that it seems like Cho was under surveillance.

(to be continued)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kathaksung
post Jun 9 2007, 04:25 AM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 43,738



486. Old wine in new bottle (5/23/07)

The April plot went sour which I think connected with the VT massacre and planned Attorney General Gonzalez's stepping down. The planned Gonzalez's stepping down does not relate to the firing of 8 Federal prosecutors (it's only a cover up) but related to taking the responsibility for the crime Feds would have committed in April plot. (unreasonable search and possible death in the operation.)

As usual, Feds quickly planned a new plot. The marking date for April plot is 4/17. 12 days later, they created a highway collapse on 4/29. (see "482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07")
The tactic is old: to kill my parents in San Francisco (of course, looked like natural disease), force my sister taking underground Bart from Oakland to San Francisco. Create a "terror bombing" in the tunnel. Thus they could fulfill an "elimination" and "distraction" in one operation.

Feds had carried out this tactic several times by closing the Bay Bridge. I was aware of this because each time they shut down the Bay Bridge, it always coincidence to the alleged framed case. Since Bay Bridge is the second busiest bridge on the globe, Feds each time could only close it for two days (week ends). That helped me to know the exact action day they planned. This time they closed a main exit highway from the Bay Bridge, hoping it could be closed for long period. After the highway collapse, the minister of Federal transportation, Mary Peters visited the spot and promised to pay the full cost. The recover time was set for six month (half year). Wah, DOJ got six months for their plot, I thought.

But that incident made impact on economy. Expert estimate that before the highway reopening, the economy would have a loss of 4 million to 6 million each day. Then, Governor Schwarzenegger announced the rebuilding would be done in two months. He set the date at June 27. What made him choose that date, I don't know. It coincidence with Tony Blair's date of stepping down. It seems the Inside Group having its fiscal year ending at that month.

Yesterday, the newspaper said the highway 580 will reopen on 5/25. From 6 months to less than a month, the difference is too big. A 500% error margin is not professionals should make. The 6 months estimation at first may reflect the Feds desire. They want a long period for their plot. Less than a month is actual time needed for reconstruction. It may also reflect that Feds abandoned their original plan. I have immediately revealed the oil tanker crash was a designed accident of Feds on May 3 - four days after the highway collapse.

Then what will happen next? Still the old tactic. Terror attack and war to distract. After a silence for more than a month, such news come out again, from Cheney, Bush and Muller.

Re: "On Carrier in Gulf, Cheney Warns Iran
By DAVID E. SANGER
Published: May 11, 2007
BRUSSELS, May 11 - Vice President Dick Cheney used the deck of an American aircraft carrier just 150 miles off Iran's coast as the backdrop today to warn the country that the United States was prepared to use its naval power to keep Tehran from disrupting off oil routes or “gaining nuclear weapons and dominating this region.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/world/mi...cnd-cheney.html

Re: "Pres. Prepares for Possible D.C. Nuke
14-May-2007
Recently Whitley Strieber speculated that another terror attack might be on the way-a nuclear attack , this time. On May 10, President Bush issued a national security directive ordering all agencies to prepare for a surprise attack on the Federal government.
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=6203

Re: 'FBI's Mueller: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons
Ronald Kessler
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
http://www.newsmax.com/popunders/mainpop_internal.htm

Re: "Confirmed: Photos Show London Dirty Bomb Tests

New photograph confirms devices going up throughout London are to track spread of gasses
Steve WatsonInfowars.net
Monday, May 21, 2007

We hope that the latest dirty bombs tests do not "go live" in an amazing coincidence such as happened on 7/7/05 when scheduled drills of exploding trains actually happened at the same time in the same places.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAndAli...m/message/18871


487. Informants troop (6) (5/28/07)

8. Cho was under surveillance

If you used to get up at 7:am, when your family member get up before 5.a.m. would you follow up him(her)? Generally, people would go on with his sleep. Do you have habit to follow up your family member to the bathroom? Generally people don't bother others in bathroom unless there is emergency.

Re: " "Caught in the backlash", (ACLU reported on 11/13/01),

Charlotte Wu, a 20 years old student of UC Berkley, was visited by 3 policemen of camps about one month after 911 last year. It's about 30 minutes after she finished a phone call. In phone call, she instructed her friends how to play an internet game. It's a spy game. Player must put bomb at the foot of wall to break it. Policemen questioned her why she talked about spy and bomb on the phone. At last, she had to go to her friend's place with police to clarify it. Lucky enough, her friend was still playing that spy and bomb game.

Charlotte Wu never talked to policemen for all her 19 years experience. (She was 19 then) She was very scare and wonder how could police know what she said in phone call. Policemen didn't explain.

She may never know her phone is under surveillance if she hadn't talked about spy and bomb.

http://www.aclunc.org/911/backlash/wu.html

http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeenne...ion/4519596.htm

(I learned this from "World Journal" of 11/14/2002 in which it said Ms. Wu still didn't know how police could know her phone call one year later. Several days later a message told me it was reported by her suite-mate. I am surprised at that for the whole year Ms. Wu hadn't got an explanation from police, now when it became a news, they said it was from an informer. Some response said it was Echelon or Carnivore. So despite of the surveillance system on communication, there maybe a surveillance net of informant? No wonder Ashcroft proposed TIPS programme of one million informants.)

There were other cases indicated informant are everywhere.

In July, 2006, news reported the Miami terror cell case. In which FBI sent an informant, disguised as Al Qaida messenger, to direct the group to attack FBI office throughout the country.

In May, 2007, news reported the extremists group plotted to attack Fort Dix. In which FBI sent an informant to offer the group the assault rifles.

Remember, FBI doesn't have a crystal ball which can tell it where there is a terror cell. There must be a surveillance net gave it the information. So before Feds could sent out a directive informant to set up the case, there was an informer there already.

From above samples, we know how densely and thickly the informant are used. Each dorm of the university or about average six people there is one informer. This is a spy country.

In July 2002, former Attorney General Ashcroft announced Operation TIPS in which government will recruit one million mail carriers, utility readers..... to be informants to report suspicious event. . I at first wondered how could the Feds recruit one million people in a short period. How big is US Army? One million and something. It's almost another Pentagon to recruit one million informants. Then as I get familiar with Feds, I knew they have that informant troops already. Operation TIPS is only an attempt to turn one million of that troops from the underground to formal establishment.

Cho Seung Hui's behave in bathroom at about 5 a.m. on 4/16/07 was recorded either by a needle point camera or some people's mind. It means he was under close surveillance that particular day. Because he would play an important role in the coming tragedy - a scapegoat of the massacre. Feds didn't want their plan go wrong.

(to be continued)

488. S.S.G. and Cho Seung Hui (7) (6/3/07)

9. Cho was recruited as S.S.G.

Informants used to watch and report other people in daily life. But when there is an operation, they will be called to look out, to be "reliable witness", even take part in the operation. Their name then are "Special Support Group".

Re: ," The FBI Special Support Group , or SSG (They're nicknamed G's), supposedly does much of the routine work for the Bureau, leaving the FBI agents themselves free to pursue more important matters. ...

They usually work part-time, and earn about $5,000.00 - $10,000.00 per year or more. The FBI doesn't advertise the existence of the SSG, but it's no big secret either. The reality of the Special Support Group is much different than the "released" information. SSG teams regularly harass and even menace people on the FBI's Black List. ...

The FBI calls this harassment "dangling," and they do it on a regular basis to people who frequently have committed no offense other than to have drawn the ire of the Bureau. Many SSG's are of the lowest caliber of human life, especially those chosen for excessive harassment of innocent citizens. Far too often SSG teams consist of bullies, perverts, racists and ex-convicts and other dregs whose sole purpose is to drive people crazy and ruin their lives. If one of their victims snaps and tears one of them up, the bloodied G will press charges, perjure himself if confronted with his FBI affiliation, and the victim is locked up. Mission accomplished. That's one reason why the FBI is not very open about the SSG. This is just one of the many questionable and outright illegal activities that the FBI uses our tax dollars for. The very people sworn to uphold our Civil Rights are perhaps the most flagrant violators. If you attend a protest rally, or otherwise call attention to yourself, don't be surprised if you start seeing the same bizarre group of people showing up everywhere you go, bothering you and behaving like psychotic clowns."

http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/tradecencrimes/page447.html

Harassing people is only the open side S.S.G.does. Covertly they used to support Feds in their operation: Muhammad and Malvo were accused of as the snipers in DC sniper shooting spree. They were also accused of involved in a murder case in Alabama. In that case, two women were shot when they closed a liquor store at night. One died, one seriously wounded. When patrol police arrived, they saw Muhammad was searching the victim's purse, with a handgun in his right hand. Malvo was about 50 yards away, possibly acting as a lookout. When police chased Muhammad through a parking lot, a blue car darted out to block the way of police. Muhammad thus escaped. Later, law enforcement agent proved the woman died of a rifle shot which was used in DC sniper shooting later.

So, in Alabama case, there were more people involved: the real gunman with a rifle. (Muhammad holding a handgun) and the man who drove the car to block police's chasing. Muhammad and Malvo were possible sacrifice. They worked in front line: checking the victim and looking out. Took the risk to be arrested. Muhammad may also have another job: to be thorough on victims. That was to kill the undead. The seriously wounded woman was lucky enough that police car arrived on time. Or her wound was so serious (shoot at neck) that Muhammad thought she was dead. (see: "115. The third leg in Alabama shooting case. (2/17)")

I think Cho Seung Hui was recruited as an informant and played the same role Muhammad and Malvo played in Alabama case. He was instructed to buy a handgun and then was ordered to practice it in a shooting ranch in March, all purposed to take part in the Virginia Tech. shooting operation. I reached this conclusion after I read another news.

(to be continued)


489. June 15 plot (6/8/07)

When Governor Schwarzenegger announced the June 27 the set up date for that collapsed highway 580. I knew Feds tried to finish their plot at the end of June.

There was a big shift change recently in the long term surveillance team.

1. July 1 is the beginning date for the new garbage contract. The garbage company CWS tried to avoid two more years searching in North San Jose before the new contract starts . (see "476. The Garbage company (4/3/2007)")

2. Two months ago (April) I received a letter noticed me that the management of Homeowner Association was changed with a new company.

3. Last month (May), my next door tenant moved away. The landlord, whom I haven't seen for more than 7 years, said he probably would move back in July.

All these three parties, (neighbor tenant, garbage company, homeowners management company) were there for at least more than 7 years. Now all of a sudden, they left or intend to leave. What will the new face be? It will be just new wine in old bottle - new agents in old place.

Early this month, I received a letter from the new Association Management company. It said, "During a recent site inspection it was noted that your front yard required maintenance, weeding and trimming." , "Please correct condition by: Friday, June 15, 2007." Several days ago, the neighbor landlord also remind me to trim the front yard fruit tree.

The correction work used to be given three months to fulfill. (interval between two inspections) This time it is extreme short: 15 days. Obviously Feds is in a hurry. They try to finish it before July. Feds is under pressure too. They repeat the old tactic. To force a yard cleaning. I think if I put the yard trimming junk on the street, the garbage search team will find drug trace in the trim pile and carry out a search and find the planted drugs at my house.

Why set the day on Friday, June 15? Because Friday is the garbage collection day. The work must be done before that day for garbage surveillance team to collect evidence. Why on June 15, not June 22 or June 29? Because my wife will leave for San Diego University to pick up my daughter for summer vacation on June15. She will know nothing what happens at home after her leave. And I believe my wife and my daughter will be killed in travel accident later. Feds won't let witness of their crime to survive even they are recruited informants.

Another news may prove this June15 plot.

I found the Feds try to frame a case by: search a garbage can or yard trimming pile, found drug trace (planted), then search a house, find the (planted) drug, and carry out an arrest. Any innocent people can be wronged by so said "Law enforcement agency". You can be wronged in a framed case by planted stuff.(drugs, weapons, even DNA) even you have done nothing. It's conflict to the Fourth Amendment that protect people from unreasonable search and arrest. I think it's still an illegal action. Feds just does their last pitch struggle. So some one will take the responsibility for it.

I allege A.G. Gonzalez will take that responsibility. He gives order for an illegal action. Then resigns for the "mistake" in internal investigation. He would have resigned if 4/17 plot going successfully. (see "477. Internet planting and April plot (4/8/07)")

An intimidation for 4/17 plot.
Re: (Mercury News 4/4/2007)

..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17."

Anyhow, 4/17 plot went soured. So was Gonzales' resignation. He would stay. according to the news four days after 4/17:
Re: "Focus shifts from Gonzales to Rove
By Margaret Talev and Ron Hutcheson
McClatchy Washington Bureau (Mercury News, 4/21/2007)

Gonzales' testimony Thursday left senators convinced he wasn't behind the plan or its execution and in fact knew far less than a department head should have about the details. "

But on May 25, resignation came back.
Re: "Stepping down or stay, all will be known in the midst of next month

The Senate has arranged a no-confidence vote over Attorney General Albert Gonzales in the midst of next month. Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo said he called the attorney General personally to advise him to resign."
(World Journal, 5/25/2007)

The midst of next month is June 15. When I was noticed to clean the yard before 6/15 and learned my wife will leave for San Diego on same day. I recalled that May 25 news.

Are you familiar with it? The resignation pressure always come with the action date of the plot. Is it a coincidence? Your bet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kathaksung
post Jun 19 2007, 07:49 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 2-November 03
Member No.: 43,738



490. Ready for war (6/13/07)

VT massacre was done instead of war as a distract to the framed case on me . My revelation is so true that caused fierce reaction from Feds.

I was heavily harassed in internet. I frequently lose contact to internet and had to re-start the connection. I was repeatedly asked to log in the web (it used to be automatically log in) then was told "invalid user's name or password". Thus being banned to post. Though I have request a new password, I never received the reply e-mail. One open intimidation is like this:

TheDivineMsEm Sent: 5/1/2007 6:12 PM

Kathasung - I warned you before. Next mention of the Va Tech killings as some sort of "government conspiracy" will get you banned.

http://groups.msn.com/PoliticallyIncorrectCafe/general.msnw?

My posting at that site since was either deleted or removed.

And Feds obviously upgrade their operation. They used to shut down Bay Bridge for two days in the name of repair. This time they burned down one major exit Freeway of the Bay Bridge. Blocked the road for nearly a month.

The "terror attack" they planned to justify the war from last October to this March was a "dirty bomb attack". This time Feds will use a nuclear weapon. (see # 486)

The "terror attack" propaganda used to be aided by its loyal ally - British, now likely will extend to other European countries.

Quote, "US will extend Al Qaida terror attack into German

Sources told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa that US security men tested German security by trying to smuggle C4 plastic explosive past a checkpoint at Heiligendamm.

German surveillance machinery detected the tiny stash in a suitcase in a car and the Americans in plainclothes then identified themselves. German police declined comment."
<http://www.eux.tv/article.aspx?articleId=9424>

The war in Mid-east will be a vast one. Civil war in Lebanon; civil war in Palestine; civil war in Iraq and war with Iran.

The previous plan of Iran war was air strike at Iran's nuclear factory, now it will be a ground war. Then we saw in May, the House suddenly ended a confrontation with Bush administration, released the Iraq military fund. Bush got what he needed for Iran war. The expense for Iraq operation is about 56 billion each year. This time Bush got more than 100 billion, almost double than ordinary expense. What is extra money for? It's for Iran war.

One thing interesting is: almost at same time, Cindy Sheehan quits the anti-war movement. It may indicate that there will be a war. Feds does not want Bush being bothered by peace movement when Bush's population is in historical low.

(Is Cindy Sheehan a false flag Feds set up to decompose the anti-war movement? Sheehan got popular in August 2005 when she settled camp outside Bush's Texas ranch. She then led the group to the north for a big anti-war protest. As we know, this was the time of hurricane Katrina and Rita hit the South America. On 9/24 hurricane landing date, there was also a big anti-war protest in Washington. In my case, 9/24 was also Feds' action date which used to be followed by a "terror attack". see "343. Killing two birds by one stone (9/17/05)"
If the framed drug case went successful, there would have been a big terror attack, (possibly dirty bomb attack) the anti-war movement would be humiliated.)

Cindy Shehan's rising and elusion connected to two big plots planned by Feds. That's why I see her from another angle.

491. June 15 plot (2) (6/18/07)

Five days before 6/15, I did the maintenance work. It was a big pile of the yard trimming. I dare not put it for garbage collection. The evil purpose of the Homeowners' management company was very clear. So I managed to cut these yard trimmings into pieces and used them as fertilizer for tree.

Feds' preparation for the June 15 was evident, especially in Mid-east.

1. For Lebanon civil war:

On 6/13, an anti-Syrian lawmaker was assassinated in Beirut. "The killing further tested the precarious fragility of a Lebanese government already mired in an extended confrontation with its opposition, a protracted battle with Islamists in a Palestinian refugee camp." (Mercury News, 6/14/07) Hezbollah said the killing was "targeting Lebanon and its stability."

2. For Iraq civil war:

"Retaliation feared after attack on shrine, Iraqi leader urges restraint"

Two minarets at a revered Shiite shrine demolished whose partial destruction last year sparked a devastating increase in sectarian bloodshed.
(Mercury News 6/14/07)

3. For Palestine civil war:

On 6/13, Mercury News reported "Palestinian factional fighting intensified" with whole page story. On 6/15, "Hamas seizes control of Gaza strip".
"A victory for Hamas would all but destroy the 3-month-old Palestinian unity government and eradicate any hope of reviving Israeli-Palestinian peace talks." (Mercury News 6/14/07)

All these events were serious, would have developed to a big mess in Mid-east. But all have diminished after 6/15. It's miraculous.

Another clue for my case is A.G. Gonzales' stepping down: "Stepping down or stay, all will be known in the midst of next month. "Nothing was heard after the midst of next month (6/15)". It has gone with the soured 6/15 plot.

On 6/15, I switched on my computer. To my surprise, the computer started up with a system set up program. The program lasted for 30 minutes or so. I could do nothing with it in the meantime. I think it was a virus embedded in my computer particularly for the plot. Though I
often suffered computer harassment, they used to happen when I was on Internet. To be blocked at the first second is something new for me. They wouldn't let me leave any message in computer if something bad took place on that day. Feds really prepared everything for the 6/15 plot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kathaksung
post Jun 29 2007, 08:05 PM
Post